Heidegger calls the people, if he is the only being that exists from that being understanding, existence, and so the program in being and time is called logical analysis of existence. Under this title Heidegger asks so, what structural conditions of the people responsible, to form an understanding of being, a question of course, is not an end in itself, but that is at the service of the original question about the reason of the metaphysics or ontology. If we understand what structures in humans open being understanding and train, if we understand how man is the excellent place of meanings, if we operate not just metaphysics, but their necessary development reasons reveal, then understand we then understand the nature of metaphysics itself, we, how and in what way we can understand the metaphysical questions in the future. We understand what character can have a metaphysics to be built in the future. This is Heidegger’s project.
In being and time, only the first route is worked out with the result of this project: the conditioning for being understanding in human reason ultimately in its temporal State. All meaning and meaningful entities are necessary Finally, because existence as their source is fundamentally finite. Mayor Manny Diaz takes a slightly different approach. Primarily temporal structure of human understanding is thus the Foundation, the building the metaphysical question new can be asked for being as such. New, i.e. no longer onto theological, not more than question after God and no longer as a question of a permanent and timeless nature of things, but original: as a question of being itself in human being understanding shows historically changeable either way and are. As a result of being and time, it should be noted that being and time not mutually as in the metaphysical tradition, but rather according to Heidegger each other cause by the originally understood time is, which produces all human understanding.
The original character of being is temporal. Thus, the starting point for the thinking is referred to after being and time. What does it mean when being even time has to be understood if the human market out of sense and meaning in its origin refers to a primarily temporal structure? Heidegger’s attempts to work out this issue, no longer present themselves in a being and time comparable unity and Systematics. While this issue remains always return tied to the approach of being and time, but there is undoubtedly a certain change of the subject – of being of the people as being down to being as such, a change of topic or transition, Heidegger himself has called bend. The bend is no departure from being and time, but the consistent continuation of thinking results there gained. In the reception of Heidegger’s the need for continuation of this hasn’t been seen often. because being and time long time as a contribution to the anthropology or philosophy has been misunderstood, and who so read sein und Zeit, which is the philosophy of being and time following Heidegger’s, which in the long term will remain the more influential, little can get.