The educational process in our lives is complex and consists of many variables: the values and traditions of our family, the customs of our culture, our experiences and lessons we can learn from them and, ultimately, formal education that we receive. The latter will play an important role in our lives, since the majority of people decide their future on the basis of formal education you have received. Both parents and children rely on traditional education systems provide the tools to ensure a good future, since this has the aptitude of preparing a person so that it can be inserted into the labor market with success. It’s all about getting excellent grades, studying a career and then find a good job. However, this successful formula is not valid for all children.

If so, all students in a course should be able to have good grades, graduating with great success and find a suitable job. And we all know that it is not. Within a course there is always a pair of outstanding students, then there are heap and a couple of students considered diplomatically regular performance, which are typical children with school problems. Why is there this difference being that school is supposedly designed to supply an entire population with the education needed to get ahead in life? Could it be that some possess superior intelligence and others lack it? Is life really governed by a so-called law of the jungle in which the most intelligent and strong WINS and the rest have to make do with the crumbs that are unnecessary? Unfortunately many young people are left with this idea, since they have bad experiences at its school. And many of them never recover from the feeling of inferiority that acquired at school. I personally do not think that some people are just born more intelligent and does not believe in luck.

Intelligence is measured not only by simple test, leading in consideration that we have some types of intelligence human being such as: musical, space intelligence, logic-mathematics, among others, in not arresting to one only estereotipo. Bill Phelan has firm opinions on the matter. It is equivalent to say that we analyze the individual in that where it more obtains to develop its potential. ' ' So that it if has detached in its area does not exist magical formula or infallible remedy. It exists, yes, potential, devotion and persistncia' ' (MUSSAK, 2003). The psychologist Daniel Goleman created a new theory on intelligence, approaching the emotions of the rational life. He was in the boarding of this question that appeared Quociente Emocional (QE). ' ' The central question placed and studied by it was to the great lack that has the modern human being to control its level of emoes' ' (MUSSAK, 2003).

According to Goleman (1995, P. 48): Academic intelligence does not offer practically to no preparation for torvelinho or chances that they bring to the necessities the life. Exactly thus, although one high Q.I. Not to be no guarantee of prosperity, I sanction or life happiness, our schools and culture are concentrated in the academic capacity ignoring emotional intelligence, a set of traces that some would call character. Emotional Intelligence (IE) is related the abilities such as to motivate itself exactly and to persist by means of frustrations, to control impulses, canalizing emotions for appropriate situations, to practise extending gratuity, to motivate people, being helped them to liberate it its better talentos and to obtain its enrollment the objectives of common interests. The emotions many times influence the people in its decisions and this means that this if keeps active since it collaborates with the ample and global growth of the individual. It can positively be developed since it possesss as much influences on the people through the comments and evaluations of the proper behavior and feeling occulting feelings as: anger, loss of heart, frustrations and substituting them for good mood, enthusiasm and positivismo.